about-seattle

Seattle

• Seattle City Council passes plan to phase out gas leaf blowers - September 2022.
  

  By Guy Oron | September 21, 2022
  Real Change
  
  On Sept. 6, the Seattle City Council passed a resolution in support of phasing out gas-powered leaf blowers in the city by 2027. The legislation, which is a nonbinding resolution, asks the Mayor’s Office to develop a plan to stop the city and its contractors from using gas-powered leaf blowers by January 2025 and private individuals, businesses and institutions from using the machines by January 2027. However, the bill shies away from setting a hard deadline, inserting a clause reading “or later, if necessary.”
  
  The resolution was introduced by Councilmember Alex Pedersen, who represents the University District, Ravenna, Wallingford, Laurelhurst and other neighborhoods of northeast Seattle. It was passed unanimously by the council.
  
  The Seattle legislation comes after similar initiatives in other states and municipalities across the United States. In 2021, the California state legislature passed a law banning gas-powered leaf blowers and lawnmowers by 2024. Another ban in Washington, D.C., went into effect earlier this year.
  
  Behind the local initiative is the activist group Quiet Clean Seattle, which is concerned about the air and noise pollution impacts of gas-powered leaf blowers.
  
  Peri Hartman, the founder of the group, said that advancements in the development of electric leaf blowers have made the need for gas-powered ones obsolete. Hartman has been researching new electric leaf blower models and said that he has identified one that is likely powerful enough to deal with the most intensive needs, such as blowing wet leaves.
  
  He also said that, in Santa Cruz, an environmental group found that savings from switching away from fossil fuels could recoup operating costs within 10 months. “Electricity is incredibly cheap compared to gasoline, and the labor to maintain the gas engine is substantial, whereas there is zero-to-no labor to maintain an electric motor and battery,” Hartman said. “Plug it in the charger at night and in the morning you throw them in your bag and you get going. That’s it; nothing else to do.”
  
  Quiet Clean Seattle is also concerned about how gas-powered leaf blowers could pose an occupational health and safety risk to landscape maintenance workers. Gas leaf blowers can exceed 100 decibels and emit toxic fumes. One study found that an hour of operating a gas leaf blower emitted the equivalent of 1,100 miles worth of air pollution from a 2016 Toyota Camry.
  
  Advocates have also said that gas blowers disproportionately impact Latine landscape workers. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, approximately 47.1 percent of American landscape and groundskeeping workers in 2021 were Hispanic or Latine, while comprising about 18 percent of the entire workforce.
  
  While momentum is behind proponents of the gas leaf blower ban, since the legislation is nonbinding, it will be ultimately up to the Mayor’s Office to decide how or whether to implement it.
  

• Council member Alex Pedersen's resolution to ban gas powered leaf blowers, proposed for council adoption. August 2022.
  

  CITY OF SEATTLE
  
  RESOLUTION 32064
  
  A RESOLUTION declaring the City Council’s intent to phase out gas-powered leaf blowers; establishing goals and identifying actions to meet these goals.
  
  WHEREAS, The City of Seattle (“City”) has the authority to adopt policies to protect and promote public health, safety, and welfare; and
  
  WHEREAS, in 2021, the City Council (“Council”) adopted Statement of Legislative Intent OSE-003-B-001 requesting that City departments develop a plan to phase out the use of gas-powered leaf blowers in Seattle within two years and submit this plan to the Council by September 2, 2022; and
  
  WHEREAS, the Council is seeking to reinforce and elevate this request through this resolution by establishing goals and articulating specific actions the City should take to gradually phase out the use of gas-powered leaf blowers; and
  
  WHEREAS, in 2014, the City’s Department of Planning and Development (now the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections) considered strategies to reduce or eliminate the use of gas-powered leaf blowers in their response to Statement of Legislative Intent SLI 70-1-A-1 and recommended no new regulations or changes to City practices due to the lack of equivalent electric alternatives and other considerations at that time; and
  
  WHEREAS, since then, new data have revealed more of the environmental and public health impacts of gas-powered leaf blowers; electric leaf blowers technology has improved; and other jurisdictions have moved to eliminate the use of gas-powered leaf blowers; and
  
  WHEREAS, gas-powered leaf blowers most commonly have two-stroke internal combustion engines that incompletely combust their fuel, resulting in the emission of toxic and carcinogenic substances, such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and volatile organic compounds, which contribute to the formation of ozone, smog, and acid rain; and
  
  WHEREAS, best available data indicate that the use of gas-powered leaf blowers can cause direct harm to people within the vicinity by contributing to localized air pollution, creating excessive noise, and causing other negative health impacts to their operators, who are disproportionately people of color; and
  
  WHEREAS, operating a leaf blower results in particulate matter lifting into the air, which has been shown to degrade localized air quality by increasing coarse and fine particles by more than 60 percent relative to ambient air, and the smallest particles can remain in the air for up to a week; and
  
  WHEREAS, studies from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) indicate that fugitive dust (i.e., particulate matter) and exhaust emissions from gas-powered leaf blowers can pose significant health risks to operators and the public, including “cardiovascular disease, stroke, respiratory disease, cancer, neurological conditions, premature death, and effects on prenatal development”; and
  
  WHEREAS, gas-powered leaf blowers with two-stroke engines emit particularly low-frequency sound waves, including ultra-low frequency, which cause the sounds to travel longer distances and more easily penetrate walls and other barriers, magnifying the impacts of nuisance noise; and
  
  WHEREAS, the California Air Resources Board determined that operators of gas-powered leaf blowers may be exposed to an average sound of 88-101.3 decibels (dBs), which exceeds acceptable thresholds set by the World Health Organization, the EPA, and Washington State; and
  
  WHEREAS, regular exposure to sound levels higher than 70 dBs can cause hearing damage and loss to operators, and studies have shown that high environmental noise pollution can contribute to the incidence of arterial hypertension, myocardial infarction, tinnitus, and stroke; and
  
  WHEREAS, the City’s Race and Social Justice Initiative (RSJI) established a Racial Equity Toolkit (2012) analysis process, wherein the City committed to racial equity and justice principles, including prioritizing stakeholder engagement throughout policy development, especially stakeholders who are directly affected by a policy’s implementation; and
  
  WHEREAS, landscape professionals disproportionately identify as Latinx (46 percent) relative to overall workplace demographics (18 percent), putting them at greater risk of the harms caused by gas-powered leaf blowers; and
  
  WHEREAS, in response to the considerable negative impacts from gas-powered leaf blowers, over 100 cities across the nation have instituted policies limiting or banning them from use, and California has passed Assembly Bill 1346, which requires the California Air Resources Board to create a plan to phase out the sale of gas-powered leaf blowers in California by 2024; and
  
  WHEREAS, electric leaf blowers are quieter than gas-powered versions and do not emit low-frequency sound waves or toxic emissions, reducing harm to operators and other people nearby; and
  
  WHEREAS, several City departments continue to use gas-powered leaf blowers, including Seattle Parks and Recreation, the Seattle Department of Transportation, and Seattle City Light; and
  
  WHEREAS, transitioning away from fossil fuel-powered leaf blowers is consistent with the City’s electrification plans to phase out the use of fossil fuels for transportation and buildings; and
  
  WHEREAS, while Seattle Parks and Recreation has already committed to transition ten percent of its gas-powered leaf blowers to electric models each year to reach 50 percent leaf blower electrification by 2026, the harms to workers, residents, and the environment and the wider availability of equivalent electric alternatives warrant a faster and more thorough implementation; NOW, THEREFORE,
  
  BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE THAT:
  
  Section 1. The City Council recognizes that the use of gas-powered leaf blowers causes significant adverse environmental and health impacts, including noise and air pollution, and establishes the following goals to support an expeditious transition away from their use:
  
  A. By January 2025, or later if necessary, the City and its contractors will phase out the use of gas-powered leaf blowers; and
  
  B. By January 2027, or later if necessary, institutions located in Seattle, businesses operating in Seattle, and Seattle residents will phase out the use of gas-powered leaf blowers.
  
  Section 2. To accomplish the goals in Section 1 of this resolution, the Council requests that City departments (as suggested below) pursue the following actions:
  
  A. Seattle Parks and Recreation, the Department of Finance and Administrative Services (FAS), Seattle City Light, the Seattle Department of Transportation, and other departments as appropriate, are requested to:
  
  1. Evaluate their current practices related to the use of leaf blowers and explore options to reduce reliance on leaf blowers, both gas-powered and electric, either by allowing leaves to naturally decompose or clearing them using non-motorized methods; and
  
  2. Develop and implement plans to ensure that City facilities and employees are adequately equipped with infrastructure and equipment to use electric-powered leaf blowers rather than gas-powered leaf blowers.
  
  B. Seattle Public Utilities, the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections (SDCI), the Office of Labor Standards, and the Department of Neighborhoods are requested to design a culturally-and linguistically-appropriate education and outreach strategy that informs City employees, businesses, and the general public of the negative health and environmental impacts of gas-powered leaf blowers, and encourages residents to adopt alternatives that are safer, quieter, and more environmentally friendly.
  
  C. FAS, SDCI, and other departments, as appropriate, are requested to develop a proposal that would phase out and ban the use of gas-powered leaf blowers within Seattle. The proposal should include, but not be limited to, the following:
  
  1. A Racial Equity Toolkit analysis to identify benefits or burdens of the proposal and gather feedback from key stakeholders, such as landscaping businesses that operate in Seattle;
  
  2. Whether the City should offer incentives, such as a buyback program or rebates, to landscaping businesses that operate in Seattle and low-income Seattle residents;
  
  3. What regulatory mechanism (e.g., amendment to the Noise Code) is most appropriate to support enforcement of the ban; and
  
  4. The potential benefits and reasonably quantifiable net costs (if any) to the City of implementation and enforcement of the actions requested by this resolution.
  
  Section 3. The Council requests that the Executive provide to the City Council’s Sustainability & Renters’ Rights Committee or other committee as appropriate by December 2, 2022, a proposed work program, timeline, and budget to achieve the goals of this resolution. 
  
  Section 4. Nothing in this resolution should be construed to preclude or impede the City’s ability to more quickly phase out gas-powered leaf blowers. 
  
  
  Adopted by the City Council the ________ day of _________________________, 2022, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its adoption this ________ day of _________________________, 2022.
  
  ____________________________________
  
  President ____________ of the City Council
  
  Filed by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2022.
  
  ____________________________________
  Elizabeth M. Adkisson, Interim City Clerk
  
  (Seal) 
  
  

• This is a summary from the city of recommendations on leaf blowers and using them. Also contains a link to a PDF with more details.
  

  Seattle - Leaf Blower Best Practices - What & why
  

• Two- stroke engines are noisy, exacerbate health problems, cause pollution.  We can ban or restrict them, we're hardly the first city to do so.
  Katie Wilson, Crosscut, Nov. 2019
  

  Leaf blowers ? Not in my backyard
  

• Even back in 2013, the city gets a host of complaints and is motivated to look into the issue.
  Erik Lacitis, Seattle Times, Nov. 2013
  

  Noisy leaf-blower complaints pile up in Seattle
  

• Advocates to ban leaf blowers in Seattle.
  Seattle Indivisible, Dec. 2019

  Ban leaf-blowers and fund Seattle's impeachment rally
  

about-other-jurisdictions

Cities with ordinances

Here is a sampling of what some cities have done to address leaf blower issues. It is by no means complete and, as things change over time, may not be accurate. However, it is useful to see what works in some places.

• Studio City Neighborhood Council, LA.
  

  

  Gas Leaf Blowers: Illegal and Harmful To Our Environment (PSA)
  

• KESQ TV, Palm Springs - report on city's decision to ban gas leaf blowers
  

  

  Palm Springs Leaf Blowers Ban
  

• California Cities and State Regulators Are Coming for Your Gas-Powered Leaf Blower
  

  California aims for zero emissions on leaf blowers by 2022.
  Reason.com, Jan. 2020
  

• Sanibel, Florida restricts usage of gas powered leaf blowers.
  NBC, Jan. 2020

  Restrictions on gas-powered leaf blowers go into effect on Sanibel
  

• Switching to electric leaf blowers doesn't result in higher bills from landscapers.

  Dear Huntington CALM,
  
  I am a current member [redacted] of the Yonkers Green City Advisory Committee, the mayoral committee which proposes and advises on environmental legislation and initiatives for Yonkers, the fourth largest city in New York State. Originally constituted in 2007 as the Green Policy Task Force, the GPTF undertook as one of its first initiatives the passing of a city-wide Leaf Blower Ordinance that prohibits the use of gas-powered leaf blowers during the summer months. The ordinance has been in place since then and enforcement of the ordinance has grown on an annual basis.
  
  Here is a link to the Yonkers city website that alerts the public to the ban:
  http://www.cityofyonkers.com/live/public-safety/code-enforcement-bureau/leaf-blower-ban
  
  The Yonkers Code Enforcement department is responsible for enforcing the ordinance and the department takes its responsibility very seriously. I would not be willing to say that enforcement is 100% successful, as without doubt there are landscapers who continue to defy the city rules when given the opportunity; but complaint calls to the city hotline have increased as homeowners become increasingly aware that they have an avenue through which to report violators, and the landscapers themselves are becoming more compliant with each passing season. The number of tickets for violations also continues to increase on an annual basis.
  
  I understand that a major concern in Huntington is the potential for fee increases by landscapers in response to a proposed ban. That’s
  a common tactic by landscapers in all communities. However, our city officials, including elected officials, have not reported back to the
  YGCAC that residents have been assessed with higher fees, nor have we received complaints of this nature through the city hotline.
  
  If landscapers do the math, they will realize that the purchase of battery-powered leaf blowers for use in the summer months will cost
  them no more than the continuing purchase of gasoline for their gas-powered blowers. This is a good piece of information to point out
  to them and to your Aldermen.
  
  Best of luck with your efforts to preserve the health and well-being of your community. Feel free to contact me [redacted] if I can be of further assistance.
  
  Sincerely yours,
  Terry J.
  Member YGCAC
  

• Huntington-Oyster Bay Audobon Society, Huntington NY
  Request to restrict use of gas leaf blowers in Huntington during the wramer months of the year.

  Dear Members of the Huntington Conservation Board:
  
  Huntington-Oyster Bay Audubon support restrictions on the use of Gas Leaf Blowers in the Town of Huntington for warmer months of the year, from approximately Memorial Day to Labor Day.
  
  Some of the reasons for banning:
  
  1. They're noisy. A normal decibel level, considered acceptable in residential areas, is about 60 decibels (60dB). Every increase in decibels means noise that is 10 times louder. Leaf-blowers usually generate about 70-75 dB. According to the U.S. EPA this level of noise actually degrades quality of life by interfering with communication and sleep, leads to reduced accuracy of work and increased levels of aggravation, which can linger hours after exposure.
  
  2. They worsen allergies and asthma and irritate the lungs. Because they operate at such high velocities, leaf blowers stir up the mold, allergens, and dust particles that otherwise have been tamped down with rain and decomposition.
  
  3. They waste gas. Rakes and even electric-lawn blowers offer a petroleum-free alternative.
  
  Many communities across America have recognized these issues and put some basic limits on the use of leaf blowers. Therefore we respectfully request that the town of Huntington follow their lead and place restrictions on the use of leaf blowers during the months when many people are outdoors trying to enjoy their yards, streets or parks.
  
  Thank you for your consideration on this matter.
  
  Sincerely,
  Stella M., President
  

• Recommendation that schools refrain from using gas leaf blowers.
  Snoma Valley Unified School District, June 2016
  

  To Whom It May Concern:
  
  This past fall, a group of concerned parents brought several studies to my attention about the serious health risks posed by exposure to emissions, airborne particulate matter, and noise generated by gasoline powered leaf blowers.
  
  In response, we immediately curbed leaf blower use, hired an outside consultant to conduct research, and queried other school districts. I brought the head of maintenance and operations into the discussion, and looked at budgetary restraints and landscaping needs. 
  
  Our consultant reviewed the evidence, including testimony from medical associations and physicians, as well as Grand Jury Reports from Orange and San Luis Obispo Counties that recommended schools refrain from using gas leaf blowers.
  
  When we weighed our needs and constraints with what the latest research stated about the risks associated with inhaling fine particulate matter and exhaust from two-stroke engines, as well as the negative impact of excessive noise on children, we concluded that eliminating gas-powered blowers was necessary and feasible.
  
  We stipulated that electric leaf blowers be used only as needed, never when students are present, and not within half hour of their arrival. We had the full cooperation of our maintenance staff, who purchased electric blowers and re-trained staff.
  
  I am proud to say we accomplished this in just a few months.
  
  This decision reflects the Sonoma Valley Unified School District’s commitment to fostering the health and well-being of its students, faculty, and staff while providing an atmosphere conducive to teaching and learning.
  
  Sincerely,
  
  Louann C., Snoma Valley Unified School District
  Sonoma, CA
  

• Washington DC: A summary of how the process turned out.
  The Atlantic, Mar. 2019
  

  Washington D.C Enacts a Phaseout of Gas-Powered Leaf Blowers
  

• Larchmont NY: full ban during summer months, restricted during rest of year.

  Village of Larchmont - summary of ordinance

• Tiburon, CA: 2010 ruling upheld, gas leaf blowers prohibited in residential areas.
  

  Marin Independent Journal - Tiburon leaf blower rules left alone

• Berkeley, CA: gas leaf blowers banned within city limits.
  

  City of Berkeley - Community Noise Program

• Los Angeles, CA: gas leaf blowers banned within 500 feet of any residence.
  

  Los Angeles Times - Leaf Blowers, a City by City Overview

• Evanston, IL: gas leaf blowers banned during summer and winter.
  

  City of Evanston - When is it ok to use a leaf blower ?

• White Plains, NY: gas leaf blowers allowed only 2 months in spring, 2 months in fall.
  

  

• Westchester County, NY: various cities ban gas leaf blowers in summer.
  

  New York State Turf & Landscape Association - leaf blower regulations

about-health-safety

Other organizations

• Here's Portland's website, Quiet Clean PDX.  The site is full of excellent information and references. Also, a good cartoon on the "About" page. Portland now has some leaf blower regulation - see the "Take Action" page.
  

  QC PDX - home page
  

• ZAPLA encourages compliance with leaf blower bans and restrictions by providing facts, opinions, and access to sources and to resources for the Los Angeles area.
  

  Home page
  
• Chronicles of Civic Engagement: The Leaf-Blower Battle in D.C.
  

  An excellent, comprehensive examination of the gas leaf blower issue from Jim Fallows, National Correspondent for the Atlantic magazine in Washington D.C.
  The Atlantic, Feb. 2018
  

• Whether you’re a Mayor, Director of Public Works, or a City Council Member, a Supervisor of a national land care maintenance franchise, a small lawn & garden crew, or a DIY homeowner — AGZA can help you kick gas off your grass!
  Bay Area, L.A.
  

  AGZA - American Green Zone Alliance

• Quiet Communities: runs educational, outrreach, research programs. 

  Home page

• Noise Free America: a coalition to promote quiet. This is an execellent across-the-board reference on sources of noise, effects of noise, and links to ask questions to experts.

  Home page

• Huntington C.A.L.M. Aims to move the commercial landscape industry to zero emmision, quiet, sustainable practices.

  Home page

• Quiet Clean D.C. Working with various stakeholders to shift to quiet, clean, sustainable yard care.

  Home page

about-health-safety

Health & safety

• The German envirnoment ministry said that leaf blowers can be fatal to insects in the foliage.

  Leaf blowers fatal to declining insects, Germans warned
  

• Covid-19: leaf blower fine particulate matter is increasing risk of death, especially for workers.
  Quiet Communities, Apr. 2020

  COVID-19 and Gas-Powerered Leaf Blowers: A Lethal Combination
  

• Covid-19: while people are self-quarantined, leaf blower noise is rattling nerves and creating concern about helping spread the virus.
  New York Times, Apr. 2020

  Meanwhile, in the Suburbs: Leaf Blower Drama
  

• Explains testing a car and a truck on a lab grade emissions dyno and comparing the results to both a 2 stroke and 4 stroke leaf blower.
  Edmunds, Dec. 2011
  

  

  Emission test: car vs truck vs leaf blower
  

• Expains what kind of partcles and toxins are kicked up by leaf blowers and how they contribute significantly to air pollution.
  zapla.org, Jan. 2009
  

  

  Leaf Blower Pollution
  

• Graphic explanation of how leaf blowers damage hearing, with a push to switch to electric leaf blowers.
  James Fallows, The Atlantic, Apr. 2019

  

  The 'Public Health Menace' of Fall in America
  

• Doctors in the Mount Sanai Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty unit request restrictions on leaf blowers and other equipment.

  April 2010
  Eastchester Town Hall
  Eastchester, NY
  
  Dear Eastchester Town Board Members,
  
  Re: Medical Grounds for a Restriction on Internal Combustion Power Tools and Leaf Blowers
  
  We are writing in support of Eastchester Environmental Committee Resolution 2010-1 supporting a limit on the use of internal combustion power tools and a ban on the use of leaf blowers between May 15th and September 15th in the Town of Eastchester. Such an action in parallel with many other communities that already have restrictions in place in Weschester Counter, could improve the health of the residents of the Town of Eastchester, and in particular, the respiratory status of children.
  
  We are pediatricians, industrial hygienists, and a social worker, and we are writing this letter on health effects associated with gasoline powered leaf blowers on behalf of the Mount Sinai Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit (PEHSU).
  
  The Mount Sinai PEHSU is a medical resource in environmental pediatrics for children, parents, pediatricians, health care providers, schools, government agencies and community organizations. We provide diagnostic and treatment services to children who have disease of environmental origin or who have suffered toxic environmental exposures.
  
  We also have the mission of providing trustworthy, scientifically credible information about environmental health threats to parents, teachers, elected officials and policy makers to enable well informed decisions on behalf of our children. We are supported by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). We are established by CDC as a resource for federal Region II, which include New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. Our unit is one of only eleven such units in the country.
  
  Internal combustion power tools and leaf blowers ("equipment") pose multiple hazards to human health. Children are the most susceptible members of population to these hazards because they breathe more air per pound of body weight per day than adults and thus inhale more of any pollutants that are thrown into the air by this equipment. Children's vulnerability to the health effects of this equipment is further magnified by the fact that they are passing through the stages of early development, and thus their lungs, ears, eyes, and other organ systems are inherently more sensitive to environmental hazards than the organs of adults. The hazards associated with leaf blowers and some internal combustion power tools include:
  
  1. Airborne pollutants. Leaf blowers create large volumes of airborne particulates, many of which are respirable. Inhalation of these small airborne particles can provoke asthma and other respiratory diseases in children and can increase the severity of chronic lung disease in our elderly.  Some of the other potential pollutants from leaf blowers and internal combustion power tools are carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, and, even, ozone formed from some of these other pollutants. Even lower level exposures have been associated with respiratory and central nervous system effects. These types of exposures would vary based on weather, wind, use or nonuse of protective gear and type of machine used. In general, children are more vulnerable to such exposures because they breathe faster, are rarely wearing protective equipment, are closer to the ground, and have still developing organs.
  
  2. Noise. Noise is a second hazard associated with much of this equipment. Manufacturer estimates of noise levels from leaf blowers for bystanders 50 feet aware are about 70dB and, of course, the noise is louder if residents are closer. The World Health Organization recommends general daytime outdoor noise levels of 55 dB or less. Noise may affect quality of life by impairing communication, reducing accuracy of complex tasks, and increasing stress. The intense, high frequency noise that leaf blowers generate can cause loss of hearing in the workers who operate these machines and can also affect hearing in children and other persons. The ears of infants and young children are especially vulnerable to the high intensity noise that leaf blowers produce because their auditory systems are undergoing rapid growth and development, and these developmental processes are easily disrupted.
  
  3. Eye hazards. Because of the high energy they generate, leaf blowers can propel pebbles and small sticks many feet into the air to cause serious eye injury. Workers and young children are the most vulnerable.
  
  For all of these medical reasons, and especially to protect our children, we urge you to take action to restrict the use of leaf blowers to 9 months of the year and to limit the use of internal combustion power tools to specified times of the day in the Town of Eastchester.
  
  Sincerely,
  Perry S., MD
  Maida G., MD, MPH
  Philip L., MD, MSc
  Joel F., MD
  Amir M., MD
  Angkana R., MD
  Bambi F., LCSW
  Alice F., CIH
  Norman Z., CIH

• South Coast Air Qualtity Management District
  Letter regarding the benefits achieved by making Garfield Park, in South Pasadena CA,  a "Green Zone".

  To Whom it Concerns:
  
  I’m [redacted] of the City of South Pasadena, California. Currently I [redacted] am on the Board of Governors for the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). In keeping with our pledge to become a more sustainable city we worked with SCAQMD and the American Green Zone Alliance
  (AGZA) to transition our municipal grounds maintenance from fossil fuel to cordless battery , manual, and ecologically friendly horticultural practices.
  
  This transition reduced noise and air pollution, while improving health, and generating cost savings. AGZA’s strategic partner, Quiet Communities (Lincoln, MA) is using the lessons learned from our success to replicate the process in other parts of the country.
  
  Garfield Park resides on ten acres within a densely populated residential neighborhood. It has 2 tennis courts, a playground, picnic areas, and paved walkways. Approximately half of the area is grass. Over the years we received many complaints about the noise and air pollution generated from gas-powered maintenance.
  
  Last February, after much anticipation, federal , state and local officials, along with residents attended an official ceremony celebrating the establisment of the first municipal park in the country to become an AGZA-certified “Green Zone™”. Green Zone means that it has to be maintained 100 percent gas- and emissions-free. A plaque was proudly dedicated ,designating the park an official Green Zone.
  
  AGZA and the SCAQMD worked with the city to assess needs, create a tactical plan, conduct a beta test of battery equipment, and train and certify workers. Following the success of the beta, Tru-Green Land Care received the contract to maintain the park after replacing all gas equipment (1, 60”diesel zero turn riding mower; 3, gas leaf
  blowers; 2 line trimmers, 2 edgers, and 1 hedge trimmer) with battery operated counterparts.
  
  On an annual basis, the outcomes of the Garfield Park Green Zone are estimated as follows:
  
  Exhaust emissions eliminated: 80,000 pounds
  Gas and oil consumption eliminated: 250+ gallons
  Gas and oil costs avoided: $900+
  Noise pollution reduction: 50%
  Solid waste eliminated: 20−30lbs
  Toxic waste eliminated: 40+ gallons
  
  We plan to substantially expand Green Zoning to other municipal and school properties due to the overwhelming success and support the park has received. I strongly recommend and encourage other municipalities and towns to work with AGZA and Quiet Communities to create your own Green Zones. It will be one of the best decisions you will make. Families, joggers, bike riders, picnickers and others now enjoy quiet, and fresh air. The park has become a haven for residents rather than a source of complaints.
  
  Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
  Michael C., Council Member
  

• Doctor, can you please remove my cochlear implant ? The noise from gas leaf blowers is deafening !

  December 2016
  To the Huntington Town Council Members,
  
  As you are well aware, the problems caused by Gas Leaf Blowers (GLBs) extend far beyond our community.
  
  I have been profoundly deaf in both ears since early adolescents and am now 70 years old and retired. I could not hear a television, an alarm clock, or ambulance siren. Conversations with my children, family and friends required powerful hearing aids and lip reading. Life changed with my cochlear implant. I can hear birds, neighbour’s children playing, and participate in clearly understood conversations. I also hear the excessive noise of overused GLBs.
  
  Throughout the summer months, landscapers use their GLBs to blow dirt and grass clippings at decibel levels that force me to turn off my cochlear processor that is specifically programmed for my hearing requirements. During these hours, my activities are limited. I am unable to communicate, develop anxiety and actually FEEL HANDICAPPED!
  
  Friends of mine who are visually impaired say they are startled by the sudden explosive noise of GLBs and cannot cross a street because they cannot hear approaching cars. Those with mobility limitations cannot quickly escape the dirt and other pollutants that physically assault them.
  
  I am a member of the Town of Huntington Citizens Advisory Committee for Persons with Disabilities, the Hearing Loss Association of America, The Cochlear Community, and a supporter of Huntington CALM’s efforts to restrict the use of GLBs.
  
  I strongly urge you to place appropriate restrictions on GLBs for the health of ALL our citizens.
  
  Thank you,
  Leonard U.
  Huntington, NY
  

• After a three month temporary ban in Great Neck, NY, people noticed it was more enjoyable to be outside. This resulted in a permanent ban of leaf blowers during summer months.

  Great Neck Record
  An Opinion: Leafblowers
  Written by Susan C., Great Neck Estates Environmental Conservation Comission
  November 2011
  
  A recent segment on the Charles Osgood show (Sunday morning CBS) explored leaf blowers and the people/communities from Connecticut to California who are finding their noise obnoxious and intrusive. I found the segment fascinating. It caused me to reflect back upon the time 14 years ago before Great Neck Estates had a leaf blower law in effect.
  
  I have been a member of the Great Neck Estates Environmental Conservation Copmmission for 20 plus years. In 1996, we decided to tackle the leaf blower noise and pollution problem. In orer to confront the Trustees and Board, we first collected our facts. We spent hours on the phone locating other communities across the United States that had leaf blower restrictions in effect (time consuming, pre computer days). We requested copies of their laws.
  
  We researched all the relevant health data that we could find, and found plenty - damage to hearing, autnomic nervous system stress (increases in blood pressure and heart rate), higher ozone and carbon monoxide levels in the air, as well as lung damaging particulate matter, herbicides, pesticides, rodent feces, higher pollen, volatile organic compounds, nitrous and sulphur dioxide levels. Think asthma, COPD, bronchitis, allergies, etc.
  
  As the entire community would have to vote to enact a new law, public hearings had to be scheduled. Local landscaper associations got "wind" of what we were proposing and went to work petitioning their customers with doomsday predictions about skyrocketing costs, less pristine properties, and refusing to work in Great Neck Estates.
  
  We attended community meetings with the Nassau Suffolk Landscape Association and their attorneys. It got a little ugly upon occasion. I was threated physically and warned to "butt out". Our trustees scheduled a test in GNE park, to allow the Landscapers Association to demonstrate their "new quiet" blowers. ("quiet" was quite an exaggeration.)
  
  But we had more hurdles to cross. It was suggested that we get a petition with resident signatures. We decided to ask for a three month trial ban, after which the cummunity could decide on a permanent law. We got enough signatures to enact a trial ban on blowers.
  
  As the peaceful, quiet summer stretched out, something happened. People began to notice that it was more enjoyable to be outside, whether walking a dog, sittingin the backyard, entertaining, barbecuing, letting kids play outdoors. The streets didn't look any messier or less pristine than before. And no one got higher gardening bills. At summer's end, we created a survey to evaluate residents' opinions. Resident opposition seemed to evaporate, and a permanaent leaf blower restriction was voted into effect.
  
  Apparently other communities were watching what would happen in our Village. As soon as we passed our law banning gasoline powered blowers from June 15 through Sept 15, Thomaston and Russel Gardens followed suit, and passed leaf blower restrictions. May Newburger, then North Hempstead Town supervisor, wanted to pass a leaf blower ban for all of North Hempstead, but, alas, it didn't happen.
  
  The comment over the years have only been positive, with residents asking why blowers aren't banned for even longer than the current three month time frime? I can only apologize and say that we just didn't realize. The hurdles we had to cross loomed so large, and seemed impassable. In retrospect, we shoul dhave requested a ban that began May 1, as spring clean-ups are all finished by that date. We could not have known how popular, and ahead of its time, our crusade would prove to be. In light of even more compelling health data, and so many other communities seeking the same respite from noise and polution, I wonder if the time has come to revisit this issue for all of Great Neck?

• Letter from Doctors Council SEIU to Astoria, NY city council, advocating to ban leaf blowers during the summer months.

  July 2016
  Astoria NY
  
  Dear Council Member Constantinides,
  
  Doctors Council SEIU supports Intro 59-2014 regulating the use of gas-powered leaf blowers in New York. Noise pollution is one of New York City’s most common problems, and legislation aimed at addressing this challenge can benefit all New Yorkers.
  
  It is commonly known that exposure to loud noises over long periods of time can lead to temporary or permanent hearing loss and tinnitus. According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the effects of noise induced hearing loss can limit one’s ability to hear high frequency sounds, understand speech and seriously impair one’s ability to communicate.
  
  As the union representing doctors in public hospitals and City agencies, we are concerned about additional health hazards that go hand-in-hand with the excessive use gas-powered leaf blowers. We believe that the regulation should be taken a step further to address air quality issues. The bill currently proposes that gas-powered leaf blowers be banned during the summer if they do not have a proper muffler, but we feel that gaspowered leaf blowers should be banned altogether during the summer months.
  
  Gas emissions generated by leaf blowers are hazardous to public health. Banning the use of mechanically powered blowers between June and September would certainly   help reduce the level of ozone that New Yorkers are exposed to. Decreased ozone levels could help mitigate asthma attacks, lung disease and heart problems.
  
  The California Air Resources Board found that compared to an average large car, one hour of operation of a gas-powered leaf blower emits 498 times as much hydrocarbons, 49 times as much particulate matter and 26 times as much carbon monoxide. The EPA has found that particulate matter has been linked to a wide variety of adverse health effects that have been shown to contribute to premature deaths.
  
  Various health advocacy groups agree that this issue needs greater attention from a public health perspective. The Mount Sinai Children’s Environmental Health Center has stated that children are the most susceptible to the hazards from gas-powered leaf blower emissions. Those with asthma, as well as other chronic respiratory diseases, suffer disproportionately from poor air quality: children are more likely to spend time outside; they are closer to the ground; and have higher respiratory rates than adults thus inhaling more air relative to their body size. The American Academy of Pediatrics agrees with this assessment.
  
  Several municipalities across the U.S. have instituted summer bans including nearby towns like White Plains, Yonkers and Maplewood, NJ, as well as major cities like Los Angeles that have banned gaspowered leaf blowers year round.
  
  We hope that in addition to noise levels, you will consider the overall health implications when reviewing this bill.
  
  Thank you for your attention to this issue.
  
  Sincerely,
  Frank P., MD
  

• American Academy of Pediatrics, New York Chapter 2
  Gasoline leaf blowers create significant health risks for children, including hearing loss, asthma, and allergies.

  Dear Colleagues:
  
  Please educate your patients and their families about the significant health risks associated with Gasoline Leaf Blowers (GLBs).
  
  GLB emissions worsen Ozone levels and produce airborne cancer agents.  Airborne particulates are inhaled, negatively affecting the respiratory system. Those with asthma and COPD suffer greatly.
  Children are the most susceptible. They breathe more air per pound of body weight than adults. They are closer to the ground, spend more time outdoors in the Summer; thus inhaling more  pollutants spewed by GLBs. Children’s vulnerability is further magnified by the fact that their lungs, ears, eyes, and other organs are still developing making them more sensitive to environmental hazards.
  
  The intense, high-frequency noise generated by GLBs can cause hearing loss in children. Infants and young children are especially susceptible to high intensity noises due to rapid growth and development of the auditory system. Serious eye injury may also result as GLBs propel small objects many feet into the air.
  
  The risks are summarized on the enclosed fact sheet, and include the exacerbation of asthma and allergies, as well as other effects on humans, pets, and the environment from air pollution, noise,  and eye dangers.
  
  We hope you will sign the enclosed petition and ask your patients and their families to sign. We are requesting the Town of Huntington to join 16 towns in Westchester County and over 400 municipalities across the country that have restricted GLBs. We are petitioning the town to restrict their use from May 15 - September 30.
  
  In the towns that have limited GLBs, landscapers have not suffered income hardships or worker layoffs. In fact, money has been saved on fuel, tune-ups and equipment. Rakes, brooms, or electric leaf blowers have proven excellent and healthier alternatives.
  
  Please contact me with questions or if you would like any additional information. Thank you for caring about the health of Huntington’s children and their families.
  
  Sincerely,
  Lucy W., MD, MPH
  member Committee on Environmental Health Academy of Pediatrics
  

• To the Huntington NY Conservation Board, to request a leaf blower ordinance for the city.
  American Lung Association, New York, Dec. 2013
  

  Huntington Town Hall
  Huntington, NY
  
  Dear Board Members: 
  
  On behalf of the American Lung Association in New York, we write in support of enacting a leaf blower ordinance for the Town of Huntington.  
  
  We have supported similar local restrictions on the use of leaf blowers because there will be some very real health benefits that will accrue if leaf blower restrictions are enacted into law.  Equipment that has zero-emissions (rakes and brooms and electrically powered tools) is the healthier way to go. There are many
  reasons why no-emissions technologies are best. 
  
  First, air quality in our region is rather unhealthful. Our annual report, State of the Air 2013,1 finds that ozone air pollution in Suffolk County fails our clean air test. In fact, Suffolk County had the most unhealthy levels of ozone pollution in all of the state. Additionally, the United States Environmental Protection has declared that
  Westchester County is “out of attainment” for the federal ozone2 and fine particle3 health standards.  
  
  Second, small sources of emissions can add up to be big polluters.  As you may know, one of the arguments against controlling small engines is that they are just that, small. However, studies have shown that a lawnmower running for an hour could emit the same amount of smog forming emission as that you would emit by driving a car for 8 hours. Multiply this statistic with the number of engines in your area and you have a better idea of the contribution these small engines can make to our region’s poor air quality. These small sources continue to become a bigger percentage of the pollution pie as stringent emission limits are applied to other tailpipes and to smokestacks.  
  
  Third, small engines do not have the sophisticated pollution control devices as a passenger vehicle has. Thus, the level of pollution they belch out can be quite high. 
  
  For gasoline powered-equipment, the emissions can cause or worsen ozone levels and also increase the amount of airborne cancer agents. Gasoline has many cancer
  agents in it and these engines have no real emissions controls on them.  In addition, small engines that use two-stroke technology, where the gasoline and oil
  are mixed are particularly big polluters. About thirty-percent of the fuel poured into these engines is directly emitted in the exhaust. 
  
  Finally, states are limited by federal law as to what they can do to address the emissions from small engines. Up until 2003, federal clean air laws provided states
  with the right to copy the California emission standards for small engines, which traditionally have been better than the ones that the US EPA has set. The law was changed by Congress to bar states from replicating the California emission standards for lawn and garden equipment. So we are at the mercy of the US EPA
  standard setting process when it comes to establishing emissions limits.  The options for states or local governments in New York are these: 
  
   Restrict the use of small engines; and,
   Ban the use of equipment that runs on small engines.
  
  We wish there were more choices at our disposal to deal with this very important public health issue.  Given limited options, the American Lung Association in New
  York is pleased to support local ordinances which limit the use of leaf blowers. 
  
  Sincerely, 
  Michael S.
  Public Policy & Communications 
  

• Asthma Coalition of Long Island
  May 2014
  

  Re: Public health rationale for moderating gasoline leaf blower use
  
  To the Members of the Huntington Town Board:
  
  The Asthma Coalition of Long Island/American Lung Association of the Northeast supports the efforts to amend the town code in the Township of Huntington to modify the use of Gasoline Leaf Blowers (GLBs). This action would improve the health of the public - particularly children and the elderly - and reduce pollution of our environment. Other communities in New York and elsewhere have implemented restrictions on gasoline leaf blowers without any serious economic or other consequences. Other major organizations concerned with health and the environment also support such modification. Gasoline leaf blowers pose many hazards to health and the environment, including the following:
  
  Airborne pollutants. Large volumes of particulates are stirred up which stay in the air for days. These include carcinogens and other dangerous contaminants.
  GLBs release clouds of dust that may also contain heavy metals, mold
  and fungus spores, weed seeds, insect eggs, and rodent feces,
  especially when used in the summer months when few leaves are on the
  ground. These provoke allergies and asthma, cardiovascular
  conditions, and contribute to lung disease.
  
  Each time a leaf blower is refueled, toxic fumes (Volatile Organic Compounds, or VOCs) may be released into the air. Spilling and overfilling equipment will also result in the release of VOCs, which
  react with sunlight to cause ground-level ozone (smog). Ozone affects the lungs and many other organs. Children, the elderly, and people with chronic illness are the most susceptible. Long Island’s
  air quality has rated “F” for the past 14 years, and GLBs contribute to the problem.
  
  Ground and water pollution. Gasoline spilled on lawns can seep into the groundwater and waterways, affecting drinking water and polluting rivers, lakes, and oceans. Toxins and other materials swept into streets clog storm drains and may also end up in our waterways.
  
  Harm to soil, landscapes and small animals. GLBs damages top soil, harms tender landscape plants, and disturbs the habitats of small animals and insects.
  
  Noise pollution. Gasoline powered leaf blowers create noise levels of 90-100 decibels at close range, and exceed the EPA's recommended maximum noise level even at 50 feet. Excess noise produces an increase in blood pressure, adrenaline, heart rate and stress; it also damages hearing. Landscape workers, who rarely use protective devices, are particularly at risk.
   
  For these public health reasons, we concur with the many other health and environmental organizations which support efforts to restrict the use of gasoline leaf blowers.
  
  Sincerely,
  Anne L, MPH, AE-C
  member Asthma Coalition of Long Island
  

• Prioritizing Prevention: Negative Health Effects of Gas Leaf Blowers
  Breast Cancer Action Coalition email to Huntington, NY government, Jul. 2014
  

  Dear Supervisor Petrone,
  
  As an Environmental Health focused non-profit grassroots organization, we at the Huntington Breast Cancer Action Coalition, Inc. (HBCAC) are writing to voice our concerens about the health effects of gasoline powered leaf blowers (GLBs). We work closely with the Silent Spring Institute, and their recently published review has shown that GLBs put out potential breast carcinogens such as benzene 1,3-butadiene. Other residues put out by GLBs are considred endocrine disruptors, and can be linked to asthma, cancer, and other life-long illnesses.
  
  We believe it is of utmost importance to Prioritize Prevention by identifying and mitigating the environmental causes of breast cancer and other life-long illnesses. By rasising awareness and making new policy, we can actively reduce risk and enviornmental exposure to carcinogens and endocrine disruptors, reducing the number of cases in the future.
  
  Sincerely,
  Karen M.
  Huntington BC Action Coalation

• Silent Spring Institute
  Recently published review of likely breast carcinogens from gasoline fumes and exhaust, Jul. 2014
  

  To whom it may concern,
  
  As scientists at Silent Spring Institute, we are writing to share our concerns about the health effects of gasoline powered leaf blowers and other gas-powered landscaping equipment. Our recently published review of likely breast carcinogens (available at http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1307455/) identified exposure to benzene, 1,3-butadiene, and many polyaromatic hydrocarbons as particularly high concerns based on their strength as genotoxic carcinogens and the potential for high exposure both from gasoline fumes and from the exhaust of gasoline powered devices such as leafblowers. The Institute of Medicine also recently identified benzene and butadiene as two of the environmental chemicals most likely to increase breast cancer risk (their report is available at http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Breast-Cancer-and-the-Environment-A-Life-Course-Approach.aspx).
  
  In addition to possible links with breast cancer, these chemicals and others in gasoline fumes and exhaust have been linked to asthma and other respiratory problems as well as cancer at multiple
  sites.
  
  Sincerely,
  Julia B., Silent Spring Institute
  Ruthann R., Silent Spring Institute
  Janet A., Silent Spring Institute
  

• Broadway Veterinary Hospital & Wellness Center, Sonoma, CA
  Effects of leaf blowers on animals - eyes, respiratory, skin, "fight or flight".

  In support of local efforts to ban gas leaf blowers and improve the quality of life in Sonoma and drastically reduce unnecessary harmful particulate matter in the air we breathe, I wanted to contribute a few statements and my opinion from the vantage point of a working small animal Veterinarian in Sonoma.
  
  It is very well known that particulate matter such as dust, dirt, and debris from the environment can pose a tremendous health challenge for dog, cats, and virtually all other mammals. While the normal changes in seasons, weather, rainfall, and pollen counts can all affect animals, extra particulate matter such as the debris aerosolized by leaf blowers pose a sharply increased risk for a variety of health problems for our domestic species. Among those most notably seen by me directly are:
  
  1. Significant flare up of cough, wheezing, and "respiratory" issues that encompass both infectious and inflammatory types of diseases.
  
  2. Eye problems of unknown origin--either in one or both eyes: owners report a clear discharge from the eyes or a "pink eye" situation with no previous known injury.
  
  3. Nasal discomfort: rubbing and snorting, as if to remove a "foreign body" that is not there, but rather a minute irritant that was substantial enough to bother the mucous membranes and irritate the pet’s nasal passages.
  
  4. Skin issues, including itching and scratching. These clinical signs are usually blamed completely on atopy or "allergy." There is well documented, long standing scientific evidence that the irritation in the skin is secondary to allergens that the pet has inhaled.
  
  In addition, because pets are so sound sensitive, the use of leaf blowers can startle animals and cause outdoor pets to dart away from yards and potentially scare them into more dangerous situations such as traffic or other precarious situations.
  
  The blasting "on and off" sounds made with leaf blowers has a definite impact on small animals "fight or flight" response, causing an immediate release of cortisol into the bloodstream. Especially with cats, this taxes the body and leads to a surge in blood glucose almost instantly. In my opinion, this is a good example of the loud noise made by leaf blowers having a negative impact on animals all around our town---it is not an obvious impact, but once you realize what is going on inside their bodies on a cellular level, you realize that maybe the impact is farther reaching than we previously realized.
  
  The information and examples I have stated above are only a small sample of the deleterious effects that leaf blowers have on the small animals of Sonoma. I hope that my words will help get some conversations started that emphasize the importance of considering the quality of life for our pets in Sonoma as people make an effort to decide the fate of leaf blowers in our community.
  
  I would be happy to answer any other questions regarding this topic as my time and schedule permit.
  
  Sincerely
  Vallard F., DVM ~ Broadway Veterinary Hospital
  

• The number one non-emergency call complaint is noise, in NYC. 
  Washington Post, May 2018
  

  Noise exposure is becoming ‘the new secondhand smoke’
  

• New York State, Dept. of Environmental Conservation
  Facts and tips about leaf blowers.
  

  Leaf Blowers - summary of effects
  

• World Health Organization - article on effects such as interference with communications, hearing impairment,  sleep disturbance, cardiovascular, mental health, performance, ...

  WHO - Guidelnes
  

• The center for Hearing an Communications presents a couple tables showing deciblel level for various kinds of sounds and activities.

  CHC Hearing - Common environmental noise levels

about-products

Products & operators

• Clean Air Lawn Care, Seattle, uses solar charged electric equipment and organic treatments

  Clean Air Lawn Care Seattle - home page
  

• AGZA rigorously tests and advocates for the highest quality best performing zero-emission lawncare equipment.
  

  AGZA Certified Equipment

• Letter from Setauket Landscaping Design regarding the overuse of gas leaf blowers.

  Dear Supervisor Romaine and Council Men and Women,
  
  As a member of the landscaping community, [redacted], I can speak to the fact that gas leaf blowers are overused, misused, and are often unnecessary. Summer months in particular, have no need for gas blowers, yet one often sees multiple blowers on a  single property.  How much force is needed to move a few grass clippings?  If landscapers feel the absolute need to blow, they can invest in commercial grade battery blowers which require no maintenance, don't pollute, are a good investment, and certainly are much quieter.
  
  Homeowners should also be conscious of the impact these gas powered machines have on their neighbors, themselves and environment. Using a manual rake and a broom is all you need to accomplish the task, and actually, holistically leads to a better finished result ! Raking out a lawn and garden bed actually stimulates, loosens,and improves the soil, grass, and planting areas , as well as the psychological and physiological wellbeing of the person doing the action.
  
  By decreasing the use of unnecessary gas blower usage,  we can reduce toxic emissions, provide a safer work environment for landscape workers, provide a more sustainable delivery of services, all which is are a win-win  for residents, workers,  neighborhoods and Mother Nature.
  
  As a business owner and resident in your district, I strongly support any and all initiatives to restrict/ban the use of gas leaf blowers.
  
  Sincerely,
  Steve A.
  

• Ecoquiet Lawn Care explains how they save 10-25% on labor costs by using electric tools.

  I'm George C. of Ecoquiet Lawn Care.  We use only zero emission, gasoline free lawn maintenance equipment. I wanted to let my fellow landscaping colleagues know how profitable eliminating gas equipment can be. 
  
  There are several things to consider when converting from gas to lithium battery equipment.  A huge advantage to using battery equipment supplemented with an occasion hand tool, is how easy it is to market and sign up customers. The idea markets itself!  
  
  When I started I had five customers. I put lawn signs out advertising clean, quiet, lawn care.  I immediately got 35 inquiries from neighbouring properties and communities. 
  
  I was a one-man operation at the time and I was terrified about how I could meet this instant demand for my services.   What was great about having an overabundance of customers was I got to pick and choose which clients to service. You can avoid the cheap clients and target the richer ones because you have a premium product. This lead to higher profits and better referrals.
  
  Along with savings on marketing and advertising I achieved higher profit margins.  If you choose your equipment properly you save in the range of 2-5 dollars/labor hour.  That translates to 10-25% savings on labor costs. 
  
  Choose a leaf blower with a minimum of 500cfm, 125mph and a large battery wattage rating.   It's a good idea to use a system with platform compatible batteries that have a fast recharge rate. My company charges $50/hr which is above the national average of $40/hr.   This means you make and keep more of your revenue.
  
  My first year, I was so busy I had to work holidays, but my payoff was an additional $500/day and no complaints from customers or neighbours since I did not make noise or disturb their privacy.   I always spoke to neighbours and told them if I was annoying them, to please let me know and I would come back another day.  Not a single call, not on Easter, not on Halloween not on the 4th of July. Customers and neighbours didn't even know I was there. 
  
  In my case, technology extended my workweek instead of shortening it, but no complaints from me. It is so easy to add an additional 500 workman hours per employee a year for a total of $25,000 at $50/hr and that ain't chopped liver.
  
  I did not come home reeking of gasoline fumes, my wife didn't hate doing my laundry and my ears didn't ring at the end of the day. I didn't lug around heavy gas cans and didn't have to deal with tune-ups, degreasers, belt, hoses, etc.  A true pleasure.  
  
  Running an all-electric landscaping company is a bit different and there is a learning curve involved but the effort and investment is well worth it.  You will enjoy additional profits and very happy customers.  They like the fact that they are choosing a better option for the environment, their families health, and get to enjoy
  their peace and quiet.  The whole neighbourhood appreciates it and business just keeps getting better and better.
  
  George C.
  

about-fun

Fun

• Comic, courtesy of gocomics.com
  Oct. 2020

  Non Sequitur, excessive leaf blowing
  

• A description of spring in prose. Listen or Read.
  NPR,  May 2018
  

  David Bouchier: Spring Chorus
  

• Comic, courtesy of cartoonstock.com
  

  Two people stuck on a desert isle...